When addressing issues of representation, accessibility and safety in MA, the R&A subcommittee leans heavily on our Traditions. While Tradition One states that “our common welfare should come first; personal recovery depends upon MA unity” in what is sometimes referred to as “long form” of Tradition One in Life with Hope, it further explains that “Unity should not be confused with uniformity.” Life with Hope (Tradition One). We have found it to be true that “our common welfare” and “MA unity” can be maintained, not in spite of, but because of the ways that we support the diversity of our meetings/groups and strive to better support members from underrepresented and marginalized communities. And this remains true so long as we maintain “MA unity” in other aspects of our recovery, including in upholding the principles and Traditions of MA by doing things such as working together to fulfill our primary purpose of carrying the message (Tradition Five), following the group conscience (Tradition Two) and respecting the autonomy of meetings (Tradition Four) and everything else that members do together in furtherance of “our common welfare” and “MA unity” (Tradition One), especially when they feel that they are welcome, respected, and safe to be themselves in MA.
Some individuals are only able to come to MA meetings, access recovery for themselves, and ultimately be part of a group that is working together towards the “common welfare” and “MA unity” that Tradition One speaks to when they themselves feel welcome, represented, and safe enough in MA to be themselves, and do not feel required to hide their true selves or be “uniformly alike” the other members in order to be “a part of” the group, welcome in MA, or even feel safe attending, or sharing about themselves and their recovery in MA meetings. And if a disabled person, or someone with access needs is unable to even access MA meetings due to a lack of accessibility, they cannot even be part of the “common welfare” or “MA unity” in Tradition One at all cannot even attend a meeting, so R&A’s work is supported by Tradition One,.
The importance of issues of representation and accessibility is also supported by the broad autonomy granted to meetings by Tradition Four, as it explains how the diversity of meetings that sprouts from that autonomy is beneficial to the fellowship as a whole in the ways it allows for experimentation, learning, and growth at the meeting level. Life with Hope (Tradition Four). The breadth of the autonomy granted to meetings/groups is wide, and groups/meetings are free to do whatever they would like to do with their meeting formats (provided that it does not interfere with other groups or MA as a whole) including impose additional restrictions on meeting attendance and membership (like a men’s stag meeting, a women’s meeting, a meeting for POC, or a LGBTQIA+ meeting) or put into place additional sobriety requirements for accepting milestone chips (such as requiring complete abstinence from all mind-altering substances while other meetings give chips based on abstinence from marijuana based on MA’s “singleness of purpose”).
As Life with Hope further explains “Every group can manage itself exactly as it pleases, except where MA as a whole is affected.” and “may make any decisions or adopt any format it likes.” Life with Hope (long form of Tradition Four). This is because “MA has the courage and faith to allow each group to make its own decisions” and this faith translates into having trust in MA groups/meetings to uphold the Traditions and not make decisions which would be detrimental to other MA groups or MA as a whole. Life with Hope, (long form of Tradition Four). Given that faith and trust, groups/meetings are free to choose by the group conscience to do just about anything with their group/meeting that they believe will better fulfill the Fifth Tradition, which, once again, states: “Each group has but one primary purpose, to carry its message to the marijuana addict who still suffers.”
Ultimately, the broad autonomy granted by the MA Traditions to meetings and groups by Tradition Four exists to support the diverse needs of MA’s members, and marijuana addicts who have yet to find MA by allowing meetings/groups to do whatever they believe will best fulfill the Fifth Tradition by allowing them to better carry the message to their meeting/group’s existing members, to the marijuana addict who still suffers and has yet to find MA, and in some instances, to current MA members and marijuana addicts who have not yet found MA who the group/meeting’s members believe are underrepresented in MA, or otherwise in need of a group/meeting where they might feel more welcome, safe, or better represented. So for these reasons, a group/meeting may choose within their autonomy to adopt by the group conscience a format that has language that is welcoming to underrepresented groups.
For example, a meeting/group that wants to be welcoming and safe to people of all genders, including those who may not identify as men or women, may revise the format to remind members not to use gendered language like “guys and girls” or “Ladies and Gentleman,” and offer up non-gendered alternatives like “folks” or “people” instead. The format might include other language about sharing one’s pronouns to help gender non-conforming members in the group/meeting feel better represented, welcome and/or safe, by encouraging all members to share their pronouns (cis members included, not just trans members) it normalizes not making assumptions in a way that can make some members feel more welcome than they would if the format disregarded pronouns and even said “Good evening ladies and gentleman” to further disregard their existence. While it won’t fix everything, language does matter, and it is a place to start the work of making MA a more safe and welcoming place. When a group/meeting’s format contains language or a meeting’s member’s use language that is harmful to other group/meeting members from underrepresented or marginalized groups, or that disregards their identities, it can not only make them feel unsafe, unwelcome, and not represented by MA, but also generally distracts from their recovery all of which takes away from the spirit of the Fifth Tradition.
The R&A subcommittee works to support groups/meetings, other MA committees, districts and members in their efforts to address issues of representation and accessibility, and safety concerns, so that MA will become an even safer, more welcoming and accessible place where all marijuana addicts, including more disabled addicts and addicts with underrepresented and marginalized identities, can feel better represented, more welcome at more MA meetings and safer to be themselves, so that newcomers and long time MA members alike will find and continue to carry the message of recovery and . . .
KEEP COMING BACK!
❖
If you have additional questions about the R&A subcommittee and the MA Traditions, you can contact the R&A Subcommittee or the Outreach Trustee, as the R&A subcommittee was formed by the Outreach Committee, and both committees are facilitated by the Outreach Trustee. You can also contact the Policies and Procedure Trustee with questions regarding the Traditions, and other MA Policies & Procedures.
To contact the Outreach Trustee: [email protected]
To contact the Policies and Procedures Trustee: [email protected]